tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4795284845836270713.post8639671915107760160..comments2024-03-27T11:23:43.902+00:00Comments on Beaker Folk of Husborne Crawley: The Milton Keynes StatementWodeWosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18381754587879658356noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4795284845836270713.post-57021815544949455042017-09-02T07:26:11.679+01:002017-09-02T07:26:11.679+01:00Anything that parodies that statement is welcome. ...Anything that parodies that statement is welcome. But making assumptions about David and Jonathan seems to deny the biblical literacy espoused by some extreme evangelical types.<br /><br />John Bell was honest about the whole lot of them at GB17, as reported in the Church Times (as I was at #notatGB17UKViewerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18114944341930758335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4795284845836270713.post-18817797671755754092017-08-30T22:13:36.586+01:002017-08-30T22:13:36.586+01:00Really meant David and Solomon and their multiple ...Really meant David and Solomon and their multiple wives, concubines and adulteries. David and Jonathan is, after all, an assumption. Archdruid Eileenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06481946916045861117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4795284845836270713.post-35066344292091040742017-08-30T21:32:34.111+01:002017-08-30T21:32:34.111+01:00Delicious.Delicious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4795284845836270713.post-68576512622240939832017-08-30T21:21:46.823+01:002017-08-30T21:21:46.823+01:00David and Jonathan?
David and Jonathan?<br />Tribblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15816995258021312296noreply@blogger.com