Pages

Saturday, 25 February 2012

Dawkins "Only an Agnostic"

Some people have jumped on Dr Richard Dawkins' back over his reported admission that he's not 100% convinced God doesn't exist. That strikes me as unfair. The Good Professor is, after all, a scientist. And scientists know all about  the difficulty of defining absolute certainty. In return I'd like to point out that I'm not 100% certain that there is no god, either - there's always that possibility that all the wealth and power I received after sacrificing  that goat was a total co-incidence*. Or, as we like to say, goat-incidence. But I refuse to be called an agnostic - as otherwise the only people that were not agnostic would be either insane, illogical or both.

But Richard Dawkins self-identifies as an atheist, and if that's how we identifies himself that's good enough for me. Even if he clearly doesn't mean it**.
* Not really.
**Joke.

4 comments:

  1. AE, Atheist, agnostic, theist, the label is not important and anyway boiling a person down to a single word is not useful. IMO the recent debate is about which group has the right to a privileged position WRT politics and society in this country.

    One of them or none of them?

    Like Dawkins, I'd argue it would be fairer if none did, a level playing field for all our goats to roam.

    I must say that in the 2nd article you link to I find it alarming that Atheism is being held up as being synonymous with believing the theory of evolution - that truly is illogical, although judging by the comments on the site it's not exactly a beacon of wisdom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steve, I'm with you on the playing field. Goats may safely graze, and all that. That pitch at Yeovil used to be a disgrace.

    I'd certainly not equate atheism with believing in evolution, as you know - though I can't find that implication in the article. Roman Catholics on the whole generally have no problem with the concept of evolution - the whole biblical fundamentalism thing being an early 20th century invention, it's probably a bit modern for Catholics.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your link to protectthepope.com. Most enlightening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's all right, Holger. Always happy to share the Beaker love in all directions.

    ReplyDelete

Drop a thoughtful pebble in the comments bowl