Pages

Saturday, 27 October 2012

A Radical Structural Rethink

So to deal with the over-commitment on committees, I've decided that the problem is with the whole organisational structure. I mean, since I re-organised last time, I've had what's known as a "flat organisational structure". Which, on the bright side, keeps the assistants in their places. But on the down side it does tend to over-emphasise my position at the top of the tree. And it means that the Music group is a long way from discipline - and you know that's not a great idea.

Old-fashioned organisational hierarchy

So I figured what we needed was a more post-modern, less patriarchal (or even matriarchal) organisation. Something where everybody feels they have their place - and the whole subordination thing is removed. So in future, I'm going for the following, radically different organisational structure. I'm sure you'll agree it's a vast improvement.

Vastly-improved, post-modern organisation losing all that hierarchy business

9 comments:

  1. It's certainly radical, in the truest sense of radix......

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad to see you are keeping Cleanliness next to Godliness. It would be terrible if those were ever separated.

    ReplyDelete
  3. King Arthur, eat your heart out!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Delighted that your mission continues to include cake. Keep up the good work, and remember, restructuring keeps everyone fresh and on their toes!

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the interests of health and safety, why isn't cake-baking next to cleanliness?

    ReplyDelete
  6. You've been spying on ... er, being inspired by... a group associated with my work, you have!

    The words are different, though. And you have circles and not mostly ovals.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So, instead of a flat organisation, you now have one that looks like seven, rather obese organisations, supporting a vastly obese central organisation.

    Not one for the Catwalk than? :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm actually rather concerned by the degree of laxity presented here. Previously, there was a clear separation between the Archdruid and the assistants. Now there is a small area of overlap. I worry that this might go to the assistants' heads. I suggest a carefully monitored trial period.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm actually rather concerned by the degree of laxity presented here. Previously, there was a clear separation between the Archdruid and the assistants. Now there is a small area of overlap. I worry that this might go to the assistants' heads. I suggest a carefully monitored trial period.

    ReplyDelete

Drop a thoughtful pebble in the comments bowl