In October I wrote a blogpost pointing out that the Guardian, on religious matters, except for Andrew Brown, didn't know what is was talking about.
I am pleased to note, thanks to a correspondent, that the article I was complaining about was changed to make it more boring but, more importantly, more historically accurate.
I'm not claiming any credit. But it's nice to know that they do learn occasionally. The Guardian have, on this occasion, shown an ability to tell their apse from their ambo.