Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Painting the Door - Latest

Yet more door-related misery.

Quizling tells me that he represents a number of people who really wanted the Moot House door painted green, but lack the confidence to say.

Interestingly if I add up all the silent people that Quizling claims to be standing for, and those for whom Torquil is the mouthpiece, it comes to more than the number of people that actually belong to the community. I'm starting to think that maybe the two of them are merely trying to increase their own standing, and don't represent "Silent Majorities" at all.

In any case, to restore peace, I'm going for a compromise.

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Popular Opinion

Never let it be said that I don't listen to others.

In fact, all day I have done little more than listen to Torquil as he complains that we didn't listen to him. He is insistent that "many people" secretly supported the blue paint-job for the door. Now as we all know there is nothing worse than "many people" who "just don't like to complain", but have one self-appointed spokesperson who likes little else.

So like a judge listening to a nagging widow, I have given in. The Moot House door will be blue. Green is definitely wrong.

Friday, 10 June 2011

Re-configuring a Lamp Stack

Oddest thing. We were tracking down the source of the unexpected bandwidth that was going out from the Community's network (I say "we" - this was very definitely the domain of Young Keith and Burton Dasset. And we noticed it because the incoming stream of Rowan Williams-related information (I say information) abruptly throttled back, even though we hadn't engaged the "Internet-related drivel filter".) And we found what appeared to be a small server running in one of the disused servants' quarters. It was identifiable only by a Post-it note, on which someone had written the words "New Crawleyan".

I figured we had better do something about it. But at this point I was glad to be able to show my own technical prowess. I know how to disable a server running a Lamp stack in no time. Hit it with a wood-splitting maul.

Saturday, 4 June 2011

A dangerous exercise in Democracy

I'm afraid this morning's "Say what you think" session was rather spoiled by those who think things I'd rather they didn't. Or people who don't think very much, but do like to talk.

I'd hoped that the invitation to clear the air would bring about a polylog in which all would enter into a spirit of constructive progress. Let us clear out the cobwebs of the old, I thought, and bring in a new era of openness. Where we can learn from one another.

Of course, early on it was all a little tentative. Somebody suggested - hesitantly - that we should perhaps open the roof windows in the Moot House on sunny days. We all agreed that this was a good idea, as it might stop all that fainting going on - which we have learnt was not people being overcome with emotion and/or spirituality. It might also reduce the infestation of banyan trees we've been suffering from.

A suggestion that the King James Version of the Bible might be deprecated, in line with Google's policy on browsers that aren't fit for the modern world, was resisted by our guest, Reverend Drayton Parslow, who'd come along to get some ideas for his own congregational meetings - and particularly how not to get sacked by them. Strictly speaking, Drayton shouldn't have spoken. Not because he is not a member of the community, but because he's an idiot. However on this occasion had to agree with him. Thing is, when it comes to reading of spiritual texts, sometimes the lovely sound of the words is far more important than the actual meaning. What would we do without the King James Version at Christmas? And where would Hnaef be without those words of Ps 106 coming up every now and then in the KJV - "They went a-whoring with their own inventions"?  Fact is, it makes him giggle so much it's the only Psalm we ever read.

But then, encouraged by Drayton's expostulations, everyone started to get a bit bold, didn't they? Morgwyn thought that Pouring out of Beakers was too early, as the time conflicts with her hangovers. Whereas Young Keith thought it should be earlier, so he can get to work on time.

Then Milton Ernest brought up the question of my election last week. Wanted to know if it was healthy for a community to have an election for Archdruid with only one candidate, because the other 16 candidates had all been suspended while the Probity Committee (i.e. me and Hnaef) considered whether or not they were infiltrators from the planet Squob. Well, as I explained, rules are rules. And he'll have the chance to stand himself next year, assuming he's not barred under Rule 67*.

Tilton  suggested we put Muriels on the white walls in the Moot House. I asked did he mean murals, and he said no - "Muriels". Apparently he's taken a number of artistic photos of his wife, and though they might brighten up the place. Well, we saw a couple of photos of Muriel, and even a community as open-minded as ours isn't putting that kind of "art" on the wall. In one of them, she even seems to be on holiday in Russia. And we're having nothing to do with a place that's banned our asparagus.

Then Burton suggested that I might consider making my talks more interesting and shorter. He had been at Spring Harvest, he said, and had noticed that the preachers were engaging, funny and spiritually challenging. I pointed out to him that at Spring Harvest the congregations were also more engaged and more interested in what the preacher had to say - and probably more attractive to look at, en masse, than people like Burton - and asked him which came first, the chicken or the egg? This caused an enormous argument. Drayton claimed, on Creationist grounds, that it was the chicken - while Young Keith insisted, on Evolutionary ones, that it was the egg. Eventually I had to introduce some serious conflict resolution. In other words, we threw Drayton in the pond.

Ethyl asked whether, once in a while, we could have Gregorian Chant in an act of worship. Which was just the sort of intelligent, constructive idea I had been wanting. But then Marston spoilt it by asking whether the "ordinary" Beaker people - as opposed to the Druids - could have an increase in rations.

But it was Elbert's suggestion of a Community Newsletter that really caused the trouble. Some of us asked why anyone would want a Newsletter when there is the Internet and we could create a Beaker Folk Facebook page - but others got all excited, and started offering constructive criticism of the "first edition" that Elbert had brought along. Young Keith suggested that the font was all wrong - being Gothic - and maybe a more modern one would be appropriate? But Marston, who'd only been half-listening to the discussion, thought Keith was talking about the font in St Bogwulf's chapel and went up the wall.  That font, he informed the community, wasn't Gothic - it was Perpendicular. It was hundreds of years old. And he would fight to the death anyone who tried to remove it and replace it with a modern font - which would probably be all high-tec and perspex, and flow running water into the adult baptistery which Drayton has had dug. And if that happened, said Marston, people with weak bladders would be rushing out of St Bogwulf's every few minutes and racing back to the Facilities in the Great House. And then we would have to leave the Facilities open, and remove the signing-in book for the key, and where would be the end of it?

That's the trouble with letting people speak their minds. Sometimes all you get is a kind of hollow, echo-y noise. Next Saturday we're going back to people being told what to think.


* Rule 67:  "No-one with broken knees is allowed to stand as Archdruid".

Thursday, 11 February 2010

On Voting Systems

Most enlightening yesterday afternoon, watching the electronic voting system at the Church of England General Synod break down.  They had to resort to walking through the "Aye" and "No" doors to register their votes on whether to vote on the amendment to the amended amendment, as I explained to Burton until he so unexpectedly fell asleep.  I blame it on the three hours he spent in the Marquis of Granby while I was at the Synod.  He came out babbling something about having to watch the pigeons flying.

Personally, I'm always in several minds as to the best voting system.  I generally go for the "One Archdruid, One Vote" system - where, being the Archdruid, I get the one vote.  But sometimes people get shirty and demand more of a democratic say at Moots.

So we've experimented with the "Aye" and "No" doors concept.  And the good news about the Moot House is that it has four doors - "Aye", "No", "I'm not sure" and "I don't think it's so much an either/or as a both/and".  The problem with the fourth door is the enormous cost of the lettering.  But on the bright side, it's the door that everybody goes through so as not to cause offence.  And then I get the casting vote.  And if there's ever anything really contentious, I find that the good old Slazenger helps people to determine the "right" door.

Now one system I really enjoy is the "Beaker" voting system. Everyone fills a beaker of water, and then pours the contents either into the "Yes" or "No" tank of water.  In an idea we got from 1970s editions of "It's a Knockout" we then get Burton to measure the result using a dip-stick.  He then declares the result in his celebrated "Eddie Waring" voice.  In another idea we got from the same programme, people on the other side of the argument are allowed to throw beach-balls at the voters, as they balance along the see-saws and tight-rope walk over the big pools of water on the way to the voting tanks.

Then we have the "trained cat" system.  In this, every Beaker person brings his or her trained cat, and instructs them which way to vote.  The cats go and sit on either the "Miaow" or the "Purrrrr" mat to indicate objection or agreement.  Of course, this system is liable to fraud; on occasion we have detected traces of catnip on the "Miaow" mat.

But with an electronic system all this is rendered irrelevant. As long as Keith's got the programming right, I can ensure that every vote goes my way.  The best kind of democracy is always the one that comes up with the right answers.

Monday, 26 October 2009

Moon Gibbon Poll

I'm concerned about the Moon Gibbon poll we're running. Asked whether the Moon Gibbon exists, 6 people have voted "yes". Since that happens to be the same number of people as there are Moon Gibbon Folk, including all four of their druids (they're a bit top-heavy on druids - the other two members can't be druids due to their lack of beards), we suspect that there's some poll-rigging going on. Not least because the IP address of the votes suggests they all came from the Moon Gibbon Folk's dedicated broadband access on the Howling Hill.