Friday 5 February 2010

Let's Face the Music and Liturgical Dance


Now there are those who swear that dancing is a carnal, unspiritual activity unsuitable for worship. There are those that go farther, and say it is an offence - that the uncontrolled jigglings of human bodies were never intended to be displayed at all, even in private, let alone in a setting of invocation and praise.  There are some concerned that the presentation of a gyrating human form may generate feelings of lust most unsuitable in a holy setting.  And there are others that remember that David danced with all his might before the Lord.  Yet others say the human body is a temple, and dancing is most appropriate in a worship setting as we remember that we are both physical and spiritual and rejoice in our corporeal nature.  But I worry about those.

Any way, everyone's feeling quite shocked by this morning's Liturgical Dance.  Very racy indeed.  That was a very tight leotard which seemed designed rather to accentuate than to conceal.  The pink taffeta trimmings seemed out of place.  And I don't think that the fluorescent pop socks are necessarily appropriate to a solemn ceremony like Pouring out of Beakers.  And that make-up!  Garish is not the word.  Gold lip-stick and eye shadow?  All in all more suited to a discorama than to the solemnities at hand.
Anyway, I've had a word and Marston says he won't do it again.  And we're confiscating the leotard.  Ugh.


Image from http://gospelgifs.com

2 comments :

  1. I think he borrowed that gold eye shadow, I'll make sure not to lend it out again, even Hnaef wanted to wear it....

    ReplyDelete
  2. You'll never get it back now. When I confiscated the leotard, Hnaef took the make-up "for safe keeping".

    ReplyDelete

Drop a thoughtful pebble in the comments bowl